英文线上讲座:2023年中美关系的走向

What Will 2023 Hold for US-China Relations?

美国东部时间11月2日(周三)上午9点到下午1点
北京时间11月2日(周二)晚上9点到凌晨1点

主办机构:Institute of China-America Studies
合办机构:卡特中心中美印象网站

点击这里注册线上讲座
点击这里下载讲座介绍和发言人简历

About the 2022 Annual Conference

The U.S.-China relationship continues to limp from pillar to post, even as the midpoint of the Biden administration’s term in office is fast approaching. The hoped-for détente between the two sides has been slow to arrive. President Biden has spent the better part of the past two years ‘investing, aligning and competing’ at home and abroad, attempting to shape the strategic environment around China. Pursuing avenues of cooperation with Beijing has been an afterthought, at best. For President Xi Jinping, his second term in office has encountered controversy from a foreign relations standpoint. The U.S.-China trade war kicked into full gear a few months after his 19th Party Congress investiture. Coping with the impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic and the effects of Washington’s technology embargoes, rather than a second round of win-win ‘reform and opening up’ exchanges with the United States, have been the defining features of his second term. Russia’s attack on Ukraine, furthermore, has added grist to the democracies v. autocracies framing of great power relations by the Biden administration.

As President Xi begins his third term in office, what are the Chinese leadership’s priorities vis-à-vis the United States and the Biden administration likely to be? Is there any merit to the claim that there is an implicit 2027 timeline to bring Taiwan to heel? Will the two sides restore high-level mil-mil communications and maritime CBMs that have been suspended by Speaker Pelosi’s visit? What does the composition of the new Politburo and Politburo Standing Committee signify to overseas observers from a political and policy standpoint? What is President Biden and President Xi expected to discuss when they (likely) gather for their first in-person meeting on the sidelines of the G20 Leaders Summit in Bali later this November.

In its first 20 months in office, the Biden administration has barely been interested in breaking bread with China on trade and economic matters. Will this pattern change following the midterm elections, given that China was not among the top 5 political topics leading into the midterms? Can a Phase Two trade and investment deal be consummated by the two sides that could place a floor under the rash of technology embargoes and supply chain decoupling initiatives introduced by Washington? How will the supply chain resilience-related initiatives alter the future structure of advanced manufacturing industries in the U.S. and the Asia-Pacific region? Will 2023 throw up fresh perspectives in this regard?

To listen to these and other answers to pressing U.S.-China questions discussed by experts in the field, tune in to the ICAS Annual Conference on November 2, 2022!

Latest from Blog

王飞凌:基辛格是“美国梦”的完美诠释

使基辛格得名与获利最丰的,可能是他的中国关系和知识。不过,他2011年出版的600多页专著《论中国》,虽然流传广泛、颇为可读,却被许多论者视为狭隘、肤浅;书中对中国的认知颇为欠缺、过时,观察立论与分析结论也相当偏颇、失真。

前驻华大使洛德:四十年后重温中美关系

自 20 世纪 70 年代以来,中美两国关系的性质发生了根本性的演变和变化。在两国70年代开始接触的时候以及建交之初,我们的关系主要是战略性的,包括制衡苏联,但由于中国的贫弱,双边关系很少。变革的主要驱动力是中国显著且迅速的崛起,不仅成为地区大国,而且在经济、军事和地缘政治方面成为全球大国。这就产生了老牌强国和新兴强国之间的竞争动态。

郭玉贵:卡特总统任内的教育政策(连载一)

卡特最终赢得总统大选,全国教育协会立下了汗马功劳。但全国教育协会的支持是有条件的,即卡特允诺当选后建立内阁级的联邦教育部。卡特在总统任内共做了三件毁誉参半的有关教育的大事:一是建立了内阁级的联邦教育部,二是增设大量联邦专项教育项目,三是大量增加联邦政府教育经费。

陈兼:基辛格博士对中国最大的贡献

在今天这个历史大变动的时代,中国和世界都处在道路选择的十字路口,在悼念基辛格时,这也许是人们最应当记取的他的历史遗产之一——并以此为出发点,在真正意义上推动并深化以市场化为核心和底蕴的中国的改革开放、并继续促进服务于全人类福祉的全球化进程。